MILLION NAIRA BRIBERY SCANDAL: IS ADENIJI JCA REALLY GUILTY OR JUST MESSED UP BY THE NJC?

When a young man sets out in employment in the Civil Service (Government employment) a popular prayer in Yoruba land for the employee is-



“Oko oba, ada oba
Ko ni sa e lese”



Literally this translates – “May you not be injured by the king’s (government) cutlass and hoes”
But factually it is a prayer against occurrence of mishaps and crisis in the civil service career.
That prayer, if ever said for D.A Adeniji, 72, a former Justice of the Court of Appeal and a South-Westerner from Ile-Ife the cradle of Yoruba civilization has not proved efficacious.
In year 2004, his long judicial career of 31 years starting from the Western State magistracy in 1973 ran into stormy waters and drowned, as he was dismissed from office by Olusegun Obasanjo, the then President of the Federal Republic, alongside one colleague of his Okwuchukwu Opene for corrupt enrichment.

Both judges were members of a three man Election Appeal Tribunal which sat in Enugu in that year and heard the Appeal of one One Senator Ugochukwu Uba against Honourable Nicholas Ukachukwu.
The third member of the Tribunal was K.B Akaahs J.C.A. He was the only one of the trio who left Enugu un-blemished and unscathed.
At the end of the hearing of the appeal which he lost, the respondent Nicholas Ukachukwu fired a petition against Justices Opene and Adeniji who found against him claiming that while Opene J.C.A received 15 million from his opponent, Justice Adeniji received 12 million naira. See cover story exhibit.
Upon receipt of the petition, the National Judicial Council, (NJC) set up a 3 man panel to investigate the case.


The Panelists were Justice Owolabi Kolawole, (now deceased) Justice Olakanmi and Justice Darazo. However some curious, disturbing facts attended the sitting of the NJC Panel and which facts appeared to have affected proper justice delivery in the case.
The first is that both Judges (Opene and Adeniji) accused of receiving bribes were tried together, even where the facts of the allegations clearly showed that they were allegedly bribed on different dates by different persons.

Secondly the Justice Kolawole Panel was epileptic in terms of membership participation in the hearing of the petition.
For example while the Chairman of the Panel was present when all the 14 witnesses in the matter gave their testimonies and cross-examined, while Justice Olakanmi was present for only 9 witnesses before he was removed from the panel. In Justice Darazo’s case, he was opportuned to be present for only three witnesses while Justice Gumi came on board to hear just one witness. The report of the panel was signed by Justices Kolawole, Darazo and Gumi


Thirdly proceedings in the matter suffered a near seven-month break (from April 17 2004 to November 3 2004 due to the serious illness of the Chairman of the Panel – Kolawole.

Final hearing in the matter took place on 4th November 2004 and the ruling was delivered on 17 November 2004. Thus only one panel member heard all the witnesses through while the others heard less than a quarter of the witnesses. It was clear then that Justice Darazo and Gumi relied on hear say evidence of the clearly unhealthy Justice Kolawole or documentary hear say evidence of the record of proceedings of the panel before they came on board to participate in the summing up and evaluation of the evidence before the panel.

Two weeks after delivering the ruling, the Chairman of the panel, obviously very sick still, died. Going through the record of proceedings of the Kolawole Panel and its subsequent findings as the Squib has done it is reasonable to believe that the epileptic membership of the panel as well as the prolonged adverse ill health of the now deceased Chairman of the Panel as well as the seven month hiatus in the proceedings gravely affected the correctness of the record and eventual findings of the Panel. See cover story exhibit for panel’s report.

A single important fact illustrates this point. In its official record, the Panel stated that one Okafor (PW4) gave evidence that he took one Barrister Joy Anyamene in his cab to where Justice Adeniji lived and witnessed how money said to be 12 million naira packed in 3 “Ghana-Must-Go” bags was taken in to him and that Justice Adeniji came out of the house to give him a gift of ten thousand naira. In its findings, the Kolawole Panel substantially found Adeniji J.C.A guilty of the allegation of receiving 12 million naira bribe, essentially on the strength of Okafor’s evidence. According to the Panel, that piece of evidence was damning but Adeniji J.C.A did not deem it necessary to even cross-examine the witness on the allegation.

The truth however was that this “damning evidence” was never given by Okafor against Justice Adeniji but against Justice Opene! The Squib confirmed this truth when it went through the Final Written Addresses of the Counsel for the Petitioner one Ikechukwu Ezechukwu Esq.

The address at page 3 thereof clearly stated that PW4 (Okafor) in company of a Joy Anyamene a lady lawyer, took bags loaded with money in his car, to a house where Justice Opene was and that the Judge (Opene) gave him N10,000:00! In fact in Nicholas Ukachuwu petition the petitioner did not alleged that Justice Adeniji received any money from Joy Anyamene or that same was witnessed by PW4 Okafor.

In fact Justice Adeniji raised this point in his suit FHC/ABJ/CS/2005 ADENIJI Vs AG FEDERATION & OR and the point was not denied or challenged by the defendants. The trial Judge in that matter B.F.M Nyako, now recently recommended for elevation to the Court of Appeal, noted this in her judgement of 15/6/07.



“Another issue that arose from the proceedings is that some of the evidence or testimonies given against Opene J.C.A were attributed to the Plaintiff.


This was not challenged by the Defendants. It will thus be accepted as admitted. I have not had the opportunity to see the records of the deliberations of the National Judicial Council and how and what it used to come to its conclusion even where the wrong evidence was attributed to the Plaintiff and it is so expunged. This does not vitiate the proceedings of the National Judicial Council but part of the Panel’s proceedings (Please See Case Law page).



Much to Justice Adeniji shock and dismay, he lost his case before Nyako J at the Federal High Court Abuja and has now proceeded to the Court of Appeal.
In 2008 the now bitter and frustrated Justice Adeniji wrote to the police on the matter, asking and indeed encouraging the police to investigate Honourable Nicols Ukachukwu allegation of collection of twelve million naira allegation against him but that move has also drawn a blank. See cover story exhibit.



The police appeared not too eager to carry out the request. No report of their investigation has ever been made despite constant pressure from Justice Adeniji.
However it was not as if no evidence at all was given against Justice Adeniji before the Kolawole Panel. There was evidence from one Bonti Oniugbo who claimed he followed one Emeka Okeke who works for the family of Senator Uba (the appellant in the appeal before the Opene Panel) to Justice Adeniji at a guest house.



However the said Emeka Okeke was not produced before the Panel. Worse, Onuigbo said he was only told by Emeka that the money they allegedly carried was 12 million naira. Also he was not there when the said Okeke gave the money to Adeniji JCA or when the judge collected the money! Even the alleged place of the bribey was not right. The witness mentioned guest house but the judge never stayed in a guest house while in Enugu but rather was with Justice Fabiyi of the Court of Appeal Enugu. With him was also Akaahs JCA.



Unfortunately the Kolawole Panel held that Justice Adeniji received the 12 million naira bribe twice! The first from Emeka Okeke and secondly from Joy Anyamene! The same Anyamene who in truth had nothing to do with Justice Adeniji.



To back its findings the Kolawole Panel also relied on a Yoruba proverb Justice Akaahs said Justice Adeniji told him when the bribery scandal broke out on the pages of newspapers. The proverb goes thus: Eni to ba je ki won fi ori oun fo agbon ko ni ba won je n be. (He who allows his head to be used to break a coconut will not partake of the eating).
The panel however translated the proverb thus “Whoever allows coconut to be broken on his head will never live to eat from the coconut”. According to the panel the proverb means “anybody who discloses a plot hatched to do evil will not live to see the result of the evil”.



But this is a wrong interpretation of the proverb as anyone grounded in Yoruba language will testify. Rather the more truthful interpretation will read akin to this:-“He who allows himself to be used as solution to a dangerous and difficult problem, will not partake of the eventual benefits or rewards of the solution.”



However the Kolawole Panel held the proverb to mean that-Adeniji JCA was subtly threatening Akaahs JCA to “either fall in line or be eliminated”!
It is significant that the then Attorney-General of the Federation Chief Akin Olujimi SAN did not support the recommendation of the NJC that both Justices Opene and Adeniji be removed from office. He was however over-ruled by the president Olusegun Obasanjo.



Since their dismissal from office, Justice Adeniji has not kept mum on his fate. He has gone to court, to challenge his dismissal, and he is still there. He has challenged the police to investigate the allegation against him and prosecute him if found culpable but the police has done nothing.



Anyone who has interacted with Justice Adeniji since his dismissal in service 2004 will appreciate the bitter irony of his situation. Though found to be guilty of collecting no less than 24 or 27 million naira bribe in 2004 by the Kolawole panel, the judge has been existing largely on charity and goodwill of friends and sympathisers ever since. He could ill afford to pay for legal fees both before the Kolawole panel and the B.F.M Nyako court where his cases have been heard. In the Kolawole panel, he partially represented himself and at other times was represented by the chambers of Dodo S.A.N free of charge. Before Justice Nyako he was represented free by Chief Gboyega Awomolo S.A.N. At a point he could not afford the cost of air travel to attend his cases in Abuja and according to the judge, “Lawyer Femi Falana has been kind to me too, giving me some amount of money each time I saw him but at a point in time I had to tell Femi “stop giving me all this ten thousand naira, ten thousand naira what I want you to do for me is fight for me.”



This magazine believes that the struggle for justice should not be left alone for the tired, impoverished and sagging shoulders and coffers of the judge (Adeniji JCA). The many grievous lapses in the handling of this matter, must give concern to all those who believe that it is better for a thousand offenders to escape justice than for an innocent man to be unjustifiably punished.

The Squib calls on the NBA to rise up in defence of this judge. Judges no matter their height on the bench, are and will always be legal practitioners and so are always members of the bar too.

No organization or body can champion the redressing of Justice Adeniji’s plight better than the NBA. May God give our great association the courage to do the right in this matter.

FAKE LAWYER SURRENDERS TO NBA IKEJA

Saheed Tijani, a short, dark-skinned man of thirty-four years entered the Bar Centre (secretariat of the NBA Ikeja branch, Ikeja High Court) in the morning of Tuesday 9th of June 2009.

He was armed with two letters-one for the chairman of the branch, the other for the editor-in-chief of the Squib magazine. (Please see cover story exhibit).
The letters bore the same message of apparent but questionable repentance and penitence. A rather long letter it was, but the central thrust was an admission of guilt on the part of the author (Saheed Tijani) of wrongfully and illegally operating as a legal practitioner and letting his former employer down one Barrister Gbenga Akingbehin a.k.a “Idea.”

The Squib can authoritatively reveal however that the visit of Saheed Tijani, a former chamber clerk with Gbenga Akingbehin, to the secretariat of the Tigers was not activated by a contrite, smitten conscience but was a rather a stratagem at damage control.

A day before Tijani’s visit, a much alarmed Gbenga Akingbehin had come to the Tiger’s secretariat to intimate the leadership of the branch with a sad discovery he had just made about his former-clerk, Saheed Tijani.
According to Akingbehin, he terminated Tijani’s employment with him, four years ago in 2005, for “unsavory acts and behaviour”. This after eight years of master/servant relationship between the duo.
To keep body and soul together, Tijani was not averse to using the knowledge and skills he acquired in his long years of employment with Akingbehin, even if borders on illegality and plain criminality.
In 2008 a much surprised Akingbehin, learnt that Saheed Tijani was issuing quit notices to tenants facing eviction threats from their landlords. Instead of reporting the case to the police, a merciful Akingbehin called Saheed Tijani and confronted him with proofs of his criminal acts.
Tijani’s response was to admit guilt immediately and short of shedding tears, sailed to the ground in quick prostration to his former boss, prominsing never “to do such a thing again.”

Unfortunately after being let off the hook, Tijani did not dis-engage from his path of illegality.
In the first week of June 2009 Barrister Akingbehin received a visit from a lady colleague. The visitor brought out a letter entitled “RE-THREATENING TO LIFE, ASSULT, (SIC) INCESSANT NUISANCE” “The letter-head bore the legend-Gbenga Akingbehin & Co and was signed by Tijani Saheed Esq and also carried the stamp print of the purported Gbenga Akingbehin & Co legal firm.

“Is this letter from your chambers?” asked the lady lawyer. A few glances at the letter elicited a strong denial from Akingbehin.
In the said letter, Tijani, purporting to be a lawyer in the chambers of Gbenga Akingehin & Co (the letter has an address different from the true address of Akingbehin’s office) had written to one Mr. Olaleye claiming to be counsel to Olaleye’s tenant, one Mr. Ajobiewe
A much disturbed Akingbehin wasted no time in telling the lady lawyer that the letter was a forgery and that the author was not a lawyer but a former clerk of his.

On the 8th of June 2009 Akingbehin took two decisions-he sought the assistance of the NBA Ikeja branch and the Squib magazine to track down the fake lawyer (Tijani Saheed). And on the 10th of June 2009 he also fired a petition against Tijani Saheed to the commissioner of police, Lagos State (see cover story exhibit)

However a little bird, Biodun by name a well known “All purpose fellow” in and about Ikeja High Court, friendly disposed to Tijani Saheed and who incidentally is a pal to Akingbehin, tipped off Saheed about Akingbehin’s visit to the NBA and the Squib on the matter.

When Tijani Saheed came to the NBA Ikeja Secretariat on his-“Damage Control” expedition, he did not expect any tough times. He apparently thought his letter of reomorse written in the half-baked ingenuity of a man with an incomplete formal education and inadequate grasp of a graceful use of the English language backed with sober looks and verbal apologies would be enough to save him from trouble.

But how sorely mistaken! At first when he was taken up by Adesina Ogunlana the welfare Secretary of the Tiger Bar on the contents of his letter, he made the mistake of relaxing into a few smiles and laughter.
The smiles and laughs brought out the Tiger in the welfare officer, who offered the “medulla oblongata” of the fake lawyer some rapid smacks and ordered him to his knees.

When other Tiger branch leaders joined on in the interrogation, Saheed extended the dimension of his body from a mere keening position to a full fledged prostration. Now faced with a straight forward journey to the nearest police station, Saheed quickly dissolved into tears, whilst profusely begging the Tigers to spare him a stint in the Government House on the Kirikiri canal: Hear the crook:

“Please sirs, have mercy on me. I know I have wronged Barrister Akingbehin and the Nigerian Bar Association and you too sir, Mr. Ogunlana, the Squib. I know what I have done is bad and I have come to beg for forgiveness. But it is not that I am always writing letters like this. I only did this to help my friend, so that he will not be evicted untimely from his apartment.”

After about an hour in the grip of the Tigers, Biodun the friend of the fake lawyer brought along an elderly court lady registrar to join to beg for reprieve for Saheed.

In the meanwhile the Tigers have ordered Saheed to be reporting daily to the Bar Centre every day, until a final decision is taken on him. Barrister Akingbehin however is insisting on the rightful position to get Tijani Saheed eventually prosecuted.

NBA LAGOS BRANCH CHAIRMANSHIP TUSSLE: KOLADE IS IT?

All other things being equal, a new prime leader will emerge for the Nigerian Bar Association Lagos Branch, come July 13 2009. The incumbent chairman is Erasmus Bola, Baderinwa. Four persons, all male, are in a contest to succeed Baderinwa in office. They are Chijioke Okoli (called 1988) Adegboyega Kolade (called 1991) Onakoya Adedayo (called 1985) and Taiwo Taiwo (called 1986). Of course only one of the four, aspirants will gain the much coveted seat of Premier Bar Chairman. The big question is “who?”
This write-up is an attempt to answer the question. The effort included speaking to various and diverse informed sources in the Lagos bar and the Candidates themselves (except Dayo Onakoya Esq, who on for different occasions did not pick up our calls on Saturday 6th June 2009).
As at press time it would appear, that the least acceptable candidate to electors is Dayo Onakoya. This has nothing to do with his credibility as a competent hand or the fact at his integrity (paradoxically he seems the one with the highest integrity quotient).
The problem with Onakoya’s candidacy is a striking lack of visibility on the field – most Lagos lawyers especially the younger ones (10 years and below post call) did not know him.
The reason for the lack of visibility stems
(a) from the personality profile of the Candidate, a strong willed but quiet, self effacing I-mind-my-own-business type of individual
(b) from the fact that Onakoya’s intention to run for chairmanship was fairly recent, limiting the fuller extension of necessary contacts.
Nonetheless, Onakoya has one formidable asset, he is the candidate of an established Yoruba caucus of conservative leaders and elders of the branch which include some former Chairmen of the branch like Akin Akinbote and Foluso Fayokun.
This caucus is well known and influential especially among the older members of the branch, who if they rev their political engine well may give Onakoya a powerful upward swing into the post of chairman.
As elections go, Taiwo Taiwo a former Secretary and 2nd Vice Chairman of the Lagos Bar ordinarily should have more than a fair chance of success in the contest.
For one, he is well known in the Lagos Bar, and quite an amiable gentleman who distributes salutations to people with ease. Tall, dark almost always dapper in appearance, Taiwo had always nursed the ambition of becoming the Chairman of his branch, for some time now and so created no doubt at all in that direction.
There are a number of factors however working against Taiwo’s success in the election. The first is that, the sheer fact of being married to a Judge of the Lagos State High Court, who is a former Chief Registrar of the Court, has rather unfairly cast Taiwo in the mould of a “pro-authority” person who would compromise the interests of the Bar with the Bench if he becomes the chairman on the altar of matrimony.
The second point is the lack of a strong political caucus to stand on. The Akinbote/Fayokun caucus (“Afenifere”) are not in favour of Taiwo’s bid and he has no good hope in the direction of the “Mixed Ethnic Caucus, (mainly Igbo & Yoruba practitioners) comprising of Lagos Bar figures like Kunle Uthman, Seth Amafuli who, also like the Afenifere would not want to trust Taiwo with power, constantly alleging him of incompetence when he was Secretary of the Lagos under Akinbote some four years ago. However the Squib has it on good authority that Baderinwa the incumbent chairman has thrown his support, albeit secretly for Taiwo Taiwo and that certainly is a big boost. The out-going chairman is building a new caucus round himself different from the caucus that brought him to power. It is reasonable in the circumstances then that the voting strategies that helped Baderinwa would be deployed in favour of Taiwo. Since generally the power and influence of incumbency is weighty, it may be rash to completely rule Taiwo out from contention – more so as his naturally amiable disposition will be of help in garnering votes to him and help douse the suspicion of him becoming a sell-out to the judicial authorities once in power.
If anybody in the race has the greatest capacity of swinging a surprise win in the elections it will be Chijioke Okoli. Derided by opponents as a political upstart who is just getting known in the Lagos Bar, the self confident, intellectually aware Okoli, has perhaps, the most unique quality of the contestants- he is a masked radical with the potential of bringing fresh vision into the governance of NBA Lagos branch. Yet this quality is the light of the stolid conservatism of the Lagos Bar, may be a disadvantage-will the Lagos Bar readily vote for a social activist as their apex leader?
Okoli’s central political view is to turn the Lagos Bar from more inward and internal concerns to weighty issues and matters affecting the public.
Okoli’s ethnicity must be a factor in this election. The Lagos bar is a multi-ethnic branch with Yoruba and Igbos and other old Eastern Nigerians dominating. The Yorubas are not in a too large a majority.
In this circumstances, Okoli, the only non-Yoruba in the four-man race, stands at an advantage, if ethnicity becomes a consideration, more so it is now quite some while that a non Yoruba had attained the chairmanship of the branch. Yet this advantage is already turning into a disadvantage as some electors who are Yorubas have made up their minds not to vote for Okoli simply because according to them, he represents an Igbo agenda.
Another possible weakness of this candidate is that his record of service in the Lagos bar is not as lengthy like is opponents, particularly Gboyega Kolade and Taiwo O. Taiwo making him open to accusation of being inexperienced.
The last but certainly not the least of the candidates is Adegboyega Kolade. He is in fact from our findings, as at press time the one candidate likeliest to become the next chairman of the branch. Of all the contestants, he arguably has had the longest stint of service in the Lagos bar, having been in the past 1st Assistant Secretary, Assistant Financial Secretary, Financial Secretary, Treasurer and is presently the out-going 1st Vice-Chairman of the branch.
It is significant that in all the offices he has held, particularly in the two most sensitive, Financial Secretary and Treasurer, Kolade did not suffer any indictment.
The long years in office has given two advantages over most of his opponents-presence and visibility and secondly, the political knowledge of planning to winning elections.
If any of the contestants is guilty of dithering to run, that person is certainly not Kolade. He is facing the current campaign with the attitude of marathoner and not of a sprinter, unlike some of the other candidates.
This preparedness meant that he is the candidate who has campaigned the longest than the others and who has at the earliest opportunity taken the advantage of press publicity before the use of same was forbidden by the electoral committee of the Premier Bar.
From all indications Kolade’s programme of action (similar to Taiwo Taiwo’s) is essentially welfaristic in nature-increasing members attendance and participation in bat meetings and functions, improvement on the remunerations of younger legal practitioners, commitment to the building and completion of Lawyers Estate Project, achievement of a cordial bar and bench relationship and building of a bar centre etc.
Inspite of his long campaigns and network and visibility Kolade has no sure-fine guarranty of winning the election. He is not accepted in some quarters on account of a perception of him as relatively rustic, too strong-minded and out-spoken compared to the other candidates. Also in a bar with strong gerontocratic tendencies, Kolade’s eighteen years at the bar and coupled with the fact that he is merely in his mid-forties, may work against him in some other quarters, who may consider him too young to lead the Premier bar.
Thirdly whether like or not he will suffer vote-sharing with Dayo Onakoya and Taiwo O. Taiwo on account of their common Yoruba ethnicity and similarity in programmes of action. If the vote-sharing is on an even keel and Okoli can attain a comfortable majority of “Non-Yoruba votes” coupled with some Afenifere votes, he and not Kolade may well become the next chairman of the branch.
Our reading of the political ground suggests that the two leading candidates are either Kolade and Okoli or Kolade and Taiwo Taiwo, with Okoli always posing a big threat. As for Onakoya the fourth candidate who got on the nomination ticket at the very last minute, due to lack of ready sponsors, he must dramatically improve on his visibility and in good time too for him to have any real chance of winning the election.

HOW THE ETERNAL TRIAL OF SQUIB EDITOR FAILED TO START AGAIN

Honourable Justice Augustine Adetula Alabi, the out-going Chief Judge of Lagos State is not a happy man. The scalp of Adesina Ogunlana, publisher, and editor-in-chief of the Squib a law magazine infamously described by Alabi’s predecessor in office Ibitola Sotuminu C.J as an “obnoxious intrusive publication” is yet as it were, to fall into the basket.
Justice Alabi, whose tenure in office cannot go beyond August 8 2009, come what may, has a lot of unmasked bitterness for Ogunlana, an unrepentant practitioner of the no-holds-barred, fire brand activist journalism in his weekly magazine with special and disquietingly penetrative focus on the Lagos State Judiciary and the legal practice in Lagos State.
In private discussions with many lawyers, Alabi C.J has expressed his personal desire for the disbarment of Ogunlana from the legal profession; a situation he considered is taking too long a time to happen, in the light of the six year old petition of Honourable Justice Ibitola Sotuminu against Ogunlana to the Nigerian Bar Association (See Cover Story Exhibit)
At one of the programmes of the recent NBA Lagos branch Law Week, the Chief Judge lamented that “despite the fact that former Chief Judge Sotuminu wrote a petition against some people who have been writing all sorts of things against the judiciary, nothing has happened”
Even though the aggrieved Chief Judge did not mention names but his reference was not oblique – no other person or lawyer other than Ogunlana had the distinction of being petitioned against by the former Chief Judge of Lagos State, Sotuminu J. to the Nigerian Bar Association
However in truth, the Chief Judge lacks the locus to complain –neither he nor his affected predecessor, Sotuminu C.J who authored the petition against Ogunlana has shown any diligence in the prosecution of the matter.
None of the two has ever shown up at the sittings of the Disciplinary Committee of the Body of Benchers where the Nigerian Bar Association has since July 2003 referred the matter to for trial, whereas the alleged “defamer of some Lagos State judges” Adesina Ogunlana has always attended trial.
Sources close to the Lagos State Judiciary indicate that a combination of pride and fear factors have kept the two Chief Judges away from the “theatre of engagement”. Pride, for the duo considered it below their dignity to personally join issues with Ogunlana before the Disciplinary Committee (D.C) and fear, because of a well grounded anxiety not to face the fire of cross-examination of Ogunlana’s doughty and legendary principal Counsel – Chief G.O.K Ajayi S.A.N a veteran of uncountable classic legal battles including Shugaba V Minister of Internal Affairs, the General Zamani Lekwot case, Omoboriowo Vs Ajasin, Awolowo Vs Shagari, Abiola V FGN etc.
The latest hearing in the matter took place on the Tuesday 26th May 2009. As usual, Chief Judges Sotuminu and Alabi were conspicuously absent, but a proxy, Chief Magistrate E.O Ogundare, a Deputy Chief Registrar of the Lagos State High Court was around.
The time was about 11:10a.m to commence sitting when the D.C came out of their chambers at the Court of Appeal Headquarters, Abuja to commence sitting.
The presiding chairman was Mr. Justice Umaru Eri, the incumbent chairman of the National Judicial institute. Other D.C members were Hon. Justice Aishat Dahiru Chief Judge of Sokoto State, Hon. Justice Kulu Aliyu Chief Judge of Zamfara State, Chief Nwanodi SAN, Chief O.O Nwamu, Professor S.A Adesanya SAN, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo SAN, and Chief Rafiu Lawal-Rabana SAN.
After the Committee members took their seats, the chairman opened the session by apologizing to Chief G.O.K Ajayi SAN and all other lawyers present for the failure of the D.C to sit at 10.00a.m as scheduled. Thereafter His Lordship expressed displeasure at the growing number of petitions against legal practitioners. Rounding up his “shape-up or-ship-out” speech Justice Eri warned and advised legal practitioners from desisting from unethical and unprofessional conduct and firmly expressed the readiness of the Body of Benchers to deal with the complaints and rid the legal profession of bad eggs.
Many lawyers in the audience, listening to the chairman, especially those with cases before the DC felt a chill run down their spines. One of such lawyers later confessed to the Squib that “while the chairman was talking, I thought I was facing a court-martial.”
The chill any frightened lawyer might have felt however lifted immediately when the commanding figure of Chief G.O.K Ajayi SAN the oldest and most senior practitioner stood up to give a reaction to the speech of the D.C chairman.
The Chief firmly expressed strong reservation about the chairman and implication the entire committee getting so affected about the increasing number of complainants against lawyers. In his words “it does not matter even if there are 10,000 petitions against legal practitioners, the fact remains that the Respondents are presumed innocent until allegations are proved. Your committee should therefore not give an impression that you are being influenced by the increasing numbers of petitions. It is not your business to be bothered about the number, you are to do justice”
In reaction to Chief Ajayi S.A.N, Justice Eri stated that the D.C agree with the Chief that lawyers are presumed innocent until their guilt is proved but the committee was only out to ensure that the type of good name the likes of Chief Ajayi had brought into the legal profession in Nigeria is not rubbished. The chairman assured all and sundry that the panel would be fair to lawyers brought before it.
The first matter treated pertained to the reading of a direction (equivalent of a court’s judgement) which went in favour of the respondent legal practitioner as he was absolved of all allegations brought against him which the D.C held not proved against him.
The next case was C.J Lagos Vs Adesina Ogunlana. Just then, a staff of the D.C brought the complaint to the Respondent, who was quick to note that it differed from the one, the prosecution in the matter, Mr. Dele Oye had served on him, through his counsel, Chief G.O.K Ajayi SAN in November 2008. (See Cover Story Exhibits’)
Chief G.O.K Ajayi SAN expectedly announced his appearance for the Respondent, Adesina Ogunlana Esq. With the silk were Adekunle Ojo Esq, Taiwo Adedeji Esq, and Tokunbo Phillips.
Mr. Dele Oye appeared for the Complainant (NBA) and with him were Linda Bala, the Legal Adviser of the NBA.
The first salvo was fired by Chief G.O.K Ajayi SAN who raised objection to Chief Lawal-Rabana S.A.N participation in the matter as an adjudicator on the ground that Lawal-Rabana has before the Nigerian Bar Association presently, a petition against the Respondent.
At this, Justice Eri, asked Chief Ajayi whether he was saying that Lawal-Rabana was the petitioner in the instant case.
Chief Ajayi replied in the negative but stressed that Lawal-Rabana (whom the respondent and his counsel were for the first time ever knowing to be a D.C member in Ogunlana’s matter) has a petition against Ogunlana.
At this point, one of the D.C members, the Honourable Chief Judge Sokoto State observed “He is raising the issue of bias”. The presiding chairman now asked the NBA prosecutor for his reaction. Oye said that Lawal-Rabana was not the secretary of the NBA when the petition against Ogunlana was written and that he had no hand at all in the treatment of the petition at the NBA.
After this, Oye raised objection to the presence of Adekunle Ojo Esq in the legal team of Adesina Ogunlana.
According to the learned prosecutor since the official complainant against Ogunlana was the Nigerian Bar Association and which association had briefed him to prosecute the matter and to whom he reports to, Ojo as the 2nd Vice-President of NBA cannot therefore represent Ogunlana.
In his reaction to Oye’s objection, Chief Ajayi SAN said that what the Committee should consider was whether Ojo’s appearance was likely to prejudice the committee, where the answer was ‘no’, then there should be nothing wrong with Ojo’s appearance.
But the prosecution continued to insist against Ojo’s appearance saying “the NBA must no be seen to be divided against itself” prompting Ojo, after consulting with Ajayi to withdraw his appearance for Ogunlana.
The D.C then rose to consider Chief Ajayi’s objection against Chief Lawal-Rabana, in chambers. About fifteen minutes later, the D.C reconvened but without Prof. S.A. Adesanya who was heard while leaving the premises of the Court of Appeal Abuja that “I can not be part of illegality”. In a terse ruling, Justice Eric over-ruled the objection of Chief Ajayi, stating that same lacked merit because there was no evidence before the D.C that Lawal-Rabana has any petition or complaint against the respondent before the NBA. Of course there is evidence that indeed Lawal-Rabana has a petition against the Squib editor but the evidence was not brought to Abuja before the panel on May 26th 2009 and could not have been brought since the respondent and his lawyer did not know that Lawal-Rabana was now a member of the D.C. In fact the incumbent General Secretary of the NBA Ibrahim Eddy Mark has issued a query to Ogunlana in respect of Lawal-Rabana complaints letter and has also a received a reply from Ogunlana. See cover Story exhibit.
The amended charge of 3 counts was now read to the respondent, who on that day looked more like bride-groom than a man facing the trial of his professional life Ogunlana pleaded thus “I am not liable, Sir”.
Chief Ajayi applied for adjournment in view of the amended charge which had just been served on the Respondent and the ruling of the D.C on Lawal-Rabana’s participation. Mr. Dele Oye having no objection to the request, the Committee adjourned to reconvene the next session. The date of the next hearing would be communicated later to the parties so ruled the presiding chairman.

LAGOS WONDER: ‘AFRICAN SCIENCE’ ARRESTS CRIMINAL TRIAL

It was the stuff home video stories are made off: fantastic, magical and impossible occurrences taking place in ordinary everyday living.

Take one. A bandit is cornered by trigger happy police officers, yet the “bad man” appears unruffled and will not submit to arrest. Then the bullets start to fly, only to ricochet off his body.

Take two. A lady contractor was locked in an argument with a top government official in his office. She wanted a juicy contract for her company which was ill equipped to execute same. The government official was stoutly against awarding the contract to the woman’s company. Then the lady took permission to “ease myself.” In the small room, she put some black powdery stuff on her tongue, then came out smiling sweetly at the official. After seating down she gently suggested to the “hard man” to lock the office door. He obliged her.

She suggested to him that it would be nice for the two of them to “know ourselves better this morning.” The official nodded in agreement.

She undressed and asked the man to follow suit. He obliged her. When she left the office thirty minutes later, it was with the contract papers fully signed safely in her bag, with the dazed official apologizing for the delay in doing her bid.

Take three. After six months of hectic and dangerous efforts, a top detective finally secures the arrest of a notorious fraudster and child trafficker.

The case file on the suspect was fat. However on his way to the court to prosecute the criminal suspect, the detective saw his brief case open on its own accord. Then the case file and the envelope of Exhibits emerged from the brief case and flew, yes, flew out of the moving car into the sky and disappeared.

The next thing the detective knew was that he was lying critically injured, legs broken in a hospital bed – the shocking sight of the flying case file had distracted him and he was only lucky to be alive as he had veered off his lane to have a head on collision with a bus.

If any of the incidents described above appear outlandish and impossible, what can one make of a similar incident in a true life situation that happened on Friday 15th May 2009 in the court of a Lagos judge O.D. Oluwayemi .J.

On the fateful day, the prosecution called a star witness in the case of People of Lagos State vs Pastor Mrs Gift John and three others, to the witness box. The defendants in the matter which included the husband of Gift John were facing charges including running an illegal orphanage and child stealing.

About three years ago, when the defendants were apprehended by security agents, it made front page news, with the newspapers awash with the mystical powers of Pastor Mrs. Gift John.

In a Punch Newspaper interview, Opeyemi Bamidele Esq., a legal practitioner and then Lagos State Commissionser for Youth and Sports, gave a chilling account of the difficulties of the operatives he led to storm the alleged illegal orphanage of Gift John encountered before they could get the woman arrested.

According to Bamidele, even though Gift was in the premises of her orphanage, no matter how hard and long they searched for her there, she could not be found. In fact it was a case of the more you looked the less you saw. Gift John had simply vanished. Or so it seemed.

The situation, according to Bamidele changed dramatically however, when an operative of the dreaded Oodua Peoples Congress joined the team. The OPCer was said to have brought out a ring from his pocket, thrown it at a corner of the room and presto! The hitherto invisible Gift John became quite visible, cowering in a corner, semi nude (being only in pants and bra!).

According to our geckos, the trial started well enough on 15th May 2009, with the star witness (an employee of Gift John at the orphanage) presenting a clear, coherent story of what she knew about the matter.

But just as she got to the stage pertaining to the prime suspects, the lady suddenly seized her neck and head and couldn’t utter a word again. The presiding judge, Oluwayemi was shocked at this development while the prosecuting team went into disarray.

The accused persons remained cool, calm and collected in the dock. Much as the prosecution tried to make the witness continue with her testimony, the lady could not and the judge had no option than to adjourn the matter.

After the end of all cases in the court, prosecution stayed back in the court room to investigate the stricken witness. Surprisingly, the woman had regained her power of speech. She attributed her strange condition to spiritual attack. The prosecution decided to ‘test run’ her to see how she would fare.

Alas to the utter shock of the prosecution team, the witness who was doing fine with her narration got stuck at the point in her narration that she went dumb in her oral testimony before the judge earlier in the morning. Just like before, the witness became dumb again and worse, was showing physical signs of rising mental distress.

The situation greatly perplexed the prosecution and the relatives of the witness since it was all so clear that she was not shamming.

While it appears that all fingers are pointing in the direction of the defendants as the cause of the witness’ malady, being the only possible beneficiary of the ugly situation, there is no proof to ground the suspicion.

Certainly it will be interesting to know how the case will end.

WILL THE NBA BREAK UP?

Testy debates are not new on the floor of National Executive Committee meetings of the Nigerian Bar Association. These stormy and acrimonious arguments often pit speakers with sharply divided interests against one another on sensitive issues and developments.
This was the case at the recently concluded meeting of the NBA in Sokoto (14th – 15th May 2009). The stormiest debate at the meeting was over the Report of the Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim Committee on inclusion.
The report dated 5th December 2007 was presented by the chairman of Inclusion Committee, after an introduction by the president of the bar Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu S.A.N. After Alhaji Ibrahim, popularly known as the first Northern Nigerian to became a legal practitioner, went through the report, the president of the Bar called for free and vigorious debates on the document.
Chief Mamman Mike Osumon S.A.N a member of the 25 man committee on Inclusion was the first to respond. Osuman spoke in favour of the report and urged the NEC to consider accepting it in the interest of justice and fair play to all concerned.
The next speaker, Emeka Ngige S.A.N first praised the document before shooting it down rather brutally. According to the learned silk, the report and the views it projected (reserving exclusively five key offices in the National Executive Council to wit presidency, 1st, 2nd, 3rd vice-presidencies, General Secretary to each of six geographical zones to wit, South West, North Central, South East, North East, South South and North North in any election year. The reserved positions are to be rotated in an anti clock wise fashion among the afore-mentioned zones). [See Cover Story Exhibit] are beautiful but regretted that they were suitable only for political parties like APGA, PDP, e.t.c but grossly unsuitable for a professional body like the NBA where merit, competence and popular acceptance should be the determining factors of getting elected into offices. Ngige ended by recommending the rejection of the report saying it was only fit for the dust-bin. Ngige’s conclusion generated great heat in the breasts of those in support of the report of the Inclusion Committee.
It was Agbo Madaki’s turn to make his contributions and he spoke vehemently against Emeka Ngige’s position, claiming that “the North feels cheated” under the present arrangement of minimalist zoning system where the North as big and disparate as it is, is just treated as one zone while the South has two zones (East and West))
An obviously angry Madaki threatened that there might be untoward consequences for the NBA, should the Abdullai Ibrahim Committee Report be rejected.
Once again Mike Osuman SAN was given an opportunity to speak and he condemned Emeka Ngige’s suggestion that the Inclusion Committee Report be thrown into the dustbin as rude and disparaging of the committee. He thereafter called for a vote on the acceptance or otherwise of the report.
The president of the NBA, Rotimi Akeredolu SAN, who was presiding, appeared to be giving the Osuman suggestion some consideration when the likes of O.C.J Okocha SAN came with a counter suggestion that a decision should not be taken either way on the matter until NEC members, had had opportunity to discuss with their branches on it.
In that vein O.C.J Okocha SAN suggested that voting be suspended until the next NEC meeting which takes place between July 15 and 16 2009 at Port Harcourt, Rivers State.
The president approving of this advice, which appeared popular on the floor accepted it and ruled accordingly.
But to the surprise of many, supporters of inclusion report staged a walk-out. The walk-out however did not come as surprise to the Squib.
Much earlier, credible news had reached us that “Northern Elements” had mobilised “seriously” to the Sokoto NEC meeting with the sole intent of getting the Inclusion Report accepted by the NEC or in the alternative, pull out of the NBA, to create a Northern Nigerian States Bar (NNSB) to cater for the interests of Northern Nigerian lawyers.”
According to our sources, the main grouse of those pushing for the adoption of the Inclusion Committee’s Report is the alleged marginalisation of lawyers of Northern origin from the upper echelons of the national leadership of the NBA which they claim has been dominated unfairly by Southern Nigerians, particularly the Yoruba.
According to the “Northern Elements” before the re-birth of the Bar in 1998, the South had dominated the leadership of the Bar and even since the re-birth, no Northerner has become the president of the bar.
In all since 1998, there have been seven presidents of the NBA in the following order:

Chief Okpoko SAN - 1998-2000
O.C.J Okocha SAN - 2000-2002
Wole Olanipekun SAN - 2002-2004
Bayo Ojo SAN - 2004- 2005
Lanke Odogiyon - 2005-2006
Olisa Agbakoba SAN - 2006- 2008
Rotimi Akeredolu SAN - 2008-2009
All are silks excepting Odogiyon) and are Southern Nigerians (except Bayo Ojo SAN, although a Yoruba).

A careful and informed look into the emergence of these leaders however show their emergence was not as a result of any deliberate exclusion of Northerners from ruling the NBA.
In 1998, Chief Okpoko contested in a presidential field without any Northern presence. Ditto for O.C.J Okocha in year 2000. Nobody prevented Northern participation.
In 2002 when the application of the informed arrangement of zoning presidency of the NBA began, Olanipekun SAN then an Ilorin based lawyer won election, beating a fellow Yoruba man, Segun Onakoya, a Lagos based practitioner.
In 2004, when the presidency was zoned to the North, Bayo Ojo SAN, a Northern (Kogi State) Yoruba defeated J.B Dawodu SAN (Kogi State, Kaduna based lawyer) A.B Mahmond S.A.N) (Kano State born and based lawyer) and Phillips Umeh (South East Nigeria).
The next president, Lanke Odogiyon, a former 1st Vice-President to Bayo Ojo S.A.N, is Yoruba but Kaduna based lawyer. He was not elected to the post but got the prime post by way of promotion, as it were. So Odogiyon could be regarded as an accidental President of the NBA.
Olisa Agbakoba SAN, the next president contested at a time the presidency was zoned to the East. Agbakoba though based in Lagos, is Igbo and so contested against Chris Uche SAN another Igbo, but based in Abuja and Funke Adekoya SAN, a Yoruba.
Rotimi Akeredolu SAN, a Yoruba contested in an empty field even though the presidency was zoned to the West.
In the coming election year 2010, the informal zoning system in the NBA has given the presidency to the North.
This fact baffles many bar men and women from the South. To them why should elements from a zone that would produce the next president of the bar be complaining of exclusion and even threatening to pull out of the NBA, if the Ibrahim Abdullahi Committee Report is not accepted by the NEC. The Squib learnt authoritatively that if the vote had been taken on the Inclusion Report at the Sokoto NEC and same was rejected, certain lawyers of Northern Region were prepared to call a press conference to announce the birth of a separatist bar organization to be called “NBA 2” to cater exclusively for the interests of lawyers of Northern Origin.

TERRIBLE! LAWYER DUPES OCTOGENARIAN?

The prologue of this story is before you now. The epilogue is yet to be written, but certainly it will be.
The protagonist is an 80 year old pensioner. His name is Ishola Adams. The antagonist is may be half the age of Pa Ishola Adams but he is a learned gentleman. His name is Lucas A. Bamikole.
However as far as the protagonist is concerned, Bamikole may be learned but certainly he is not a gentleman and is not honourable.
You may want to know why Pa Adams came to such a conclusion. The answer is not far fetched-close to a year now, the old man had engaged the lawyer to levy execution on some former tenants of his, in his property, but the work till date is yet to be carried out.
Since the time of his engagement, Barrister Bamikole has been giving one excuse after the other, to explain away why he is yet to carry out his own side of the bargain, despite being fully paid.
In February 2009, Pa Adams sent in a petition to Squib against Bamikole. When in the same February 2009, the Squib contacted Bamikole on phone over the issue, the lawyer told the magazine that he was in Ekiti State. According to Bamikole he went to Ekiti State to get proper medical attention for his ill-health which started “some weeks ago”. He assured the magazine that by the 25th of March, he would get the execution done once he was on his feet.
In mid-march 2009 when the Squib called him for the second time, Bamikole told this magazine that his health had greatly improved and that by the March 25 2009, the execution will “surely” be levied.
In mid-April 2009 when we placed another call to him, Bamikole told the Squib that he had just been unfortunate to have been involved in a motor car accident on his way back to Lagos, forcing him back to Ekiti State. Nonetheless the lawyer promised that by the 28th of April 2009 he would be back in Lagos to carry out the execution. Curiously the lawyer added a caveat-the Squib should remonstrate with Pa Adams to provide at least fifteen out of the thirty padlocks to secure the property after execution might have been levied. April 28 2009 came and went but there was no trace of Barrister Bamikole (called to the bar, May 2001) in Lagos and the execution was not done.
On may 7 2009, the Squib again reached out to Bamikole via the phone, enquiring from him why he has not levied execution on the 28th April 2009 as he had promised. Bamikole's response was to the effect that the combined factors of political unrest in Ekiti State and fuel scarcity, had marooned him in Ekiti State. He did not forget to ask whether the Squib had succeeded in making Pa Adams buy the 15 padlocks he asked for-as if such a purchase was a pre-requisite for his carrying out the execution assignment. Bamikole ended the conversation by assuring the Squib that come Friday 15th May 2009, he would, 'padlocks or no padlocks' carry out the execution.
Is Barrister Lucas Ayodele Bamikole a “Promise and fail” lawyer or even worse still, a fraudulent legal practitioner or is this really a case of an impatient, insensitive client unduly harassing his counsel?
Dear readers will be the judge in this case. To assist in your findings, we publish the petition of Pa Ishola Adams to the Squib as well as some of the messages SMS and letters of the counsel to Pa Adams.
And we should not forget that 15th May 2009 is just around the corner. If that day should pass again without Barrister Bamikole fulfilling his bargain, with Pa Adams, then we will know for sure that he is actually what the petitioner calls him.

Alhaji Ishola Adams
(Compliant)
Plot 208, Ajuwon Akute Road,
Ogun State.
9th February 2009

The Editor,
Squib Magazine
c/o No. 197A, Ikorodu Road,
Palm Grove Bus Stop,
Palm Grove,
Lagos.

PERSONAL ATTENTION: BARRISTER ADESINA OGUNLANA

Dear Sir,

In Re: PETITION AGAINST A SUSPECT; FAKE AND ERRANT LAWYER, BARRISTER L. AYOBAMI BAMIKOLE IN RESPECT OF BRIEFS GIVEN TO HIM BY ME ON VARIOUS DATES PARTICULARLY SUIT NO. M/190/2006 INVOLVING MY PROPERTY AT N0.34, ISAALE AGBEDE STREET, LAGOS ON THE COURT RULING GIVEN ON THE 2ND MAY 2006 BEFORE HON, JUSTICE OYEBANJI A.A (MRS).
I am rather constrained to report this incident of professioan (sic) misconduct against the above named Lawyer Barrister L. Ayobami Bamikole who has a law chamber (sic) at suite 5/6 left wing BETEL PLAZA at lle-lse Bus Stop along main Akute road besides FORTUNELAND SCHOOL along main Akute Road, Ogun State.
Regrettably, it would appear he has vacated his office since December 2008 and his where about is unknown. This is a privileged information to enable you realize the seriousness of this matter. A number of his client are looking for him to no avail and no notice of relocation from him to this effect.
To be precise about July, 2008 I personal approached him with the ultimate intention of patronizing him as a young Lawyer staying very close to my neighborhood. So that he could be of personal assistance to me in some pending legal matters of suits for resolution and I was willing to pay him his professional fees accordingly.
For a start, I requested him to write three letters on my behalf to an illegal squatter on my land at Aguda, and another delinquent Tenant, Mr. Kabiru Adeyemi Disu including the Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIP) force criminal investigation Department, (Special Fraud Unit) No 13 Milverton Road, Ikoyi Lagos on the subject matter of non - refund of Tax deductions from Railway pensioners involving N5 million naira and some other. He was paid N5,000 (five thousand naira) each on three different occasions making a total of N15,000 (fifteen thousand naira)only, and were cash receipted by Barrister Bamikole related photocopies already forwarded to you.
In regard to the letter written to (DIG) the purported cash receipts from (IFEX EXPRESS LTD) were suspected to have been mutilated. This is suspect and sinister, up till now there had been no responses from any of the addresses. When I demanded from him why this was so, he has me for more money particularly that the investigation at (DIG'S) office demanded N20,000 (twenty thousand naira) from him to pursue further the conduct the investigation this also lapsed.
Secondly, another separate brief was give him to help me in leving (sic) the execution of the court ruling and he demanded from me the sum of N50,000 (fifty thousand naira only) that is N20,000 (twenty thousand naira) at the first instance and another N30,000 (thirty thousand naira) respectively. In very close sequence, within two weeks, he said this was because of the seriousness of the matter. Since then, he has been giving me series of excuses through his letters and text messages to me giving all sort of excuses for not being able to execute this assignment that has been paid for as his professional fees.
On the whole, he had colleted from me the total sum of N65,000 (Sixty Five thousand naira only) for services not rendered. If wish to indicate that I am no longer interested in his services to me but to arrange the refund of the said total amount of N65,000 (sixty five thousand naira) only and decided to drop the issue. This is my demand, but if your magazine still wish to pursue this matter, all well and good on ethical and professional angles. At 80 years old. I can not afford the attendant stress associated with this let down from this Duper or 419 Barrister Lawyer.
Thanks you for your co-operation. Hope to hear from you soonest

Yours faithfully,



N/B all related photocopies of correspondences from him are already in
your possession. Including the recent messages sent to me.

HAND WRITTEN LETTER FROM BARRISTER BAMIKOLE TO PA ISHOLA ADAMS ON 25-07-08
Daddy,
We are unable to do the execution yesterday because the mobile police officer we have book (sic) for went for a special assignment on a peace keeping mission in Ondo-State for 2 weeks, because of the judgement of the election petition tribunal sitting on the petition filed by Dr. Mimiko against Gov. Agagu. All the mobile police in all the 6 states in the western zone of Nigeria were deployed the local govt area in Ondo state, to forestall (sic) peace.
Sir, since the mission will last for 2 weeks it means that the execution can be done by Friday 8th August 2008 or there about. But one good thing here is that, all documents had been perfected on this except that the physical presence of the police is compulsory to monitor the execution exercise and safeguard those of us that will be present at the scene.
Sir, I gave your indulgence that you should not mind the slight shift on the date of the execution, as the delay is not caused by either me or the bailiff, but the police whose presence is inevitable. We assure you that, the execution will be done as soon as the police are available since all other arrangement had been completed Sir. Until will see sir.

HAND WRITTEN LETTER FROM BARRISTER BAMIKOLE TO PA ISHOLA ADAMS ON 17-09-08
Dear Alhaji,
I saw you note and having gone through the content, I have the following to tell you sir,
(a) There is no doubt that the execution exercise had been delayed beyond necessary bit this delay was not caused by either the lawyer handling it, or the bailiff or even the registrar of the court who had signed all the necessary paper since.
(b) The police that delayed the job was on special duty since and this was confirmed to us, even by the new commissioner of police Lagos state that he can not say when he will return to duty post in Lagos police command because he was on Federal Government assignment.
(c) The only option left to us now is to bring another #15,ooo to book for another officers who may not be mobile police but he assure us that they will do the job for us. He said we need to book again because he was not the one that sign (sic) the booking we do (sic) before and that we need to sign another document since we need another set of officers.
(d) I was now in agreement with the bailiff that we should find means of raising the money and go and book for another police before ending since we can not collect those we have spent to obtain the documents and the police.
(e) Although, you as the owner of the job who has paid as much as that will be waiting to see result, but I want you to know that, it is not that I collected money from you and spend it, for my own purpose. It is not my money, I have given it to those whose services we need it for.
(f) By ending of this month we agreed to go and book for another set of police to do the job for us. I can assure you that the work will be done, we only need like a month or 3 weeks to raise money and book, for and get the work done.
(g) I have not relent (sic) on my effort to see this execution carried out, but because I have not been coming to narrate the stories of how I have been moving on the assignment you thought I am not working on it.
(H) You mention that you will report me to NBA disciplinary committee, I don’t think it has got to that, because the work you gave me is not the one I will do in my office, it is a work that must be done by other set of people which I can not control.
(I) As a lawyer I have done my own part of the assignment by giving them money for the execution of the ruling. It is not even my duty to go and book for police. It is the work of the bailiff to apply for the necessary papers and police to safeguard themselves while doing the operation.
(J) Sir, since, it is not that I deliberately decided that I will not complete the assignment, I have started, I will still plead that you give me time, to do the work for you. The money collected can not be returned by this people. No NBA can tell them to return it. For example, can NBA tell Lagos State govt to refund the money collected to prepare and sign document for the bailiff or the police commissioner who had collected money and had been transferred out of Lagos. Pls hold on for me.

HAND WRITTEN LETTER FROM BARRISTER BAMIKOLE TO PA ISHOLA ADAMS ON 15-10-08
Daddy, I was in court this morning at Ikeja on a rent matter when I finish (sic) the matter, I deliberately decided to visit the bailiff section to confirm our trip to Isala Agbede on Friday. It was a surprise that the bailiff who said he will receive his salary last week to book, confirmed to me that he was paid yesterday from his bank. According to him he wanted to go and book for 2 police officer for the job at the commissioner’s office with the #15,000 as agreed when I moved in.
We went straight to the commissioner of Police, and we book (sic) for the 2 police officer (sic) that which will follow us to the house. One major problem which crop (sic) up because of this delay in booking was that, the renewal of all the documents already signed for the exercise has not been done. This made the bailiff to give the police a longer date 24-10-08 to allow him to complete his execution paper’s renewal before the execution proper actually take place.
When I disagree with him that we can not wait for another one week, the assignment he put up was near, he will never do a work that will send him to jail. He said that the work of a bailiff is different from the work of a lawyer. He made us to understand that he should get the old document for his new booking, it will be a good ground for the parties involved to fight back and it may put himself, the police officers, the lawyer and even the landlord into trouble that we have done illegal job. I told him that you are so much in hurry to see this execution done, but he said I should plead to you that this is just a period of one week that is added, and that we should please wait for him, he will complete his paper work before execution is carried out.
Sir, from his explanation and the reasons given we do not have option than to wait till 24-10-08, the booking is done in my present (sic) at the commissioner’s office, with that assurances, that date is certain for the execution. I do hope you will bear with us. This one week delay is for our own good. Do not allow that lawyer to have opportunity of fighting us back. We should not take chances, we need to do a perfect job sir.
Sir, on our propose trip to milverton at Ikoyi, I have looked at my time table for the week, I cannot be chance (sic). But it is possible next week between Wednesday and Thursday. If you still want us to go together, you may fixed (sic) any of this (sic) two days. But baba you will pay for my full day work on that day for because it will take a whole day from us and you know that time is money for lawyer. I am only joking but you will make your boy happy when we come back for abandoning his office for a whole day.
Finally sir, I passionately plea (sic) that you bear with me and my people, whether devil like it or not the execution is going to be done this October. We are your son, (sic) do not be annoyed with us. We have to follow the normal procedure sir. Lawyer.

EXTRACT OF SMS FROM LAWYER BAMIKOLE PHONE NO 23470589 ON THE 24TH OCTOBER 2008 AT ABOUT 23.31HRS AS FOLLOWS
Sir, Today we suppose to do that execution but the registrar herself stop it and shift it to 7th Nov 2008. Her reason for that was that you must be physically present at the scene of the execution and point to the house before bailiff (sic) do theirs. This became necessary because the numbering of house might have change (sic) since the court ruling was delivered over one year ago.
The above is to avoid costly mistake of sealing another man house.

SMS message sent in by Barr. Bamikole to Pa. Ishola Adams on 06-04-09 by 3:51pm
Baba I don’t know what is happening to your work. I was on my way to Lagos this morning and our tire puncture and we had a fatal accident after Ilesha. Thank God I sustain minor injury. All of us were taking to Westly hospital Ilesha. I know by Wednesday I would be discharged we have to do the work by Friday 10th of April. I have fix that day with the bailiff. Pls sir, help me arrange to buy some key with that man you have at that house at Isale Agbede and tell him to meet us by 7am that day with the keys. I have prepared to buy the key but this unexpected spend on my treatment will not permit me to do so. If you can start coming to Lagos by 6am you may still meet us there but it is not advisable you come so that they will allow us to do our work and go. Our plan is to leave the place by 8am latest so that they will not meet us there. Pls assist me on the key I am coming to Lagos because of the work pls call me by the evening.

SMS message sent in by Barr. Bamikole to Pa. Ishola Adams on 09-04-09 by 9:35pm
Baba the bailiff said tomorrow and Monday is Public Holiday. We can not do it, so we have postpone it to Wednesday next week. Pls arrange for more keys.

SMS message sent in by Barr. Bamikole to Pa. Ishola Adams on 16-04-09 by 4:43pm
Alhaji, since you refused to assist me on the padlock that we need for the execution despite the fact that I am prepare to do it now that I am a bit ok. I have gone back to Ekiti to look for small money to borrow to buy 20 padlock for the execution I hope to be back by Thursday next week so that we can do it by Friday morning. It will be meaningless to go and do the execution with only 5 padlocks that I can afford now to a house where we need 30 padlocks. I have informed the bailiff about this development and we fixed next Friday for the operation tentatively. I would call you by Friday morning 8am when we finish.

THE TIGERS’ SUPER WEEK

Wow, what a wonderful week it was for members of the Ikeja branch of the Nigerian Bar Association, last week! It was the week set apart by the Ikeja Bar, a.k.a Tiger Branch to celebrate their branch by holding series of diverse programmes in special honour of the branch and for the education and entertainment of members and friends of the branch.
Since her inception in 1983, the Tigers have been having their “Law Weeks” but none arguably has surpassed the 2009 edition, especially in terms of quality entertainment and refreshment. Of course this is not to say, it was a perfect Week, executed flawlessly. There were visible signs of sometimes embarrassing “irregularities” like late starts, “publicity mis-prints”, “shumeric” (uncouth) behaviour on the part of some members of the Law Week Committee, like the ladies who greedily and selfishly carted home huge quantities of ‘after-events’ foods and drinks without a thought for others, even extending the same attitude, indeed aptitude to the Sheraton Hotel on Dinner day (May 1 2009).
One thing was certain however, both the Executive Committee and the M.O. Ubani led Law week Committee raised the bar for the organization of Law weeks in the Tiger Bar. The week, with the inspiring theme of “THE ROLE OF LAWYERS IN NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT” started on Monday 27th April 2009 with a well-attended press conference at the Bar Centre, Ikeja High Court, the Secretariat of the Tigers. The conference was staged to publicise the Law week.
On Tuesday, the 28th April 2009 about fifty Tigers paid a visit to the Ikoyi Prisons. The honorable Chief-Judge of Lagos State, Adetula Alabi J. accompanied by his top aides like Mrs. Latifat Folami, the Chief Registrar and Mrs. Folake Oshin, Deputy Chief Registrar, was also on the visit. At the end of the visit, quite a lot of toiletries were donated by the Tigers to the institution and sixteen of the inmates were graciously pardoned and set free by the Chief Judge.
On Wednesday, 29th April the Tigers staged a Law Clinic at Alade, the popular “rich man’s” market in Ikeja. The Law Clinic is a programme started five years ago in the administration of Adekunle Ojo esq as chairman of the branch (2004-2006). Although very well organized, with about seventy Tigers in attendance, as well as Mrs. Oluremi Tinubu, wife of the former Governor of Lagos State Bola Tinubu, only a few of the Alade Market traders availed themselves of the opportunity of the Law Clinic to receive free legal counseling and services.
In the evening, the Tigers, numbering about a hundred in all, repaired to the Martinos, an events centre at the Central Business District, Ikeja, Lagos, for their Variety Night. What a thrilling night it turned out to be! Aside the D.J - a suitably competent hand, three singing acts and one comedian, there was a thirty-man dancing troupe in attendance.
There was no dull moment at all, from the beginning of the V.N to the end as all the performers put up scintillating acts, the most outstanding being the dancing troupe with their energetic and synchronised and enthralling dancing steps and acrobatics coupled with beautiful drumming and singing.
The roof almost came down when the troupe invited their appreciative spectators of lawyers to join them on stage. The ecstasy heightened when Segun Adebayo, an up-coming actor and lawyer and Funke Akindele the producer and the lead character in the awards-raking Yoruba movie Jenifa joined in the dancing. All through, light refreshment and drinks were served in neat, organized fashion.
On Thursday 20th April 2009 at the same Martinos, the Tigers were held down to another round of “edutainment” this time in the form of intellectual engagement courtesy of a lecture-ably delivered by Professor Yemi Osinbajo S.A.N, the former Attorney General of Lagos State. The lecture, chaired by Honourable Justice Dolapo Akinsanya, retired judge of the Lagos State High Court, was entitled the The Imperative of Electoral Reforms in Constitution Governance in Nigeria.
Four eminent lawyers - Professor Oyelowo Oyewo, Mr. Fred Agbaje, Deacon Dele Adesina S.A.N and MR. Lawal Pedro, (who represented the Governor at the occasion) discussed Professor Osinbajo’s paper. It must be noted that Professor Oyewo’s contribution was the most engaging.
On Friday May 1 2009, the fifth day of the Law week, the Tigers first programme of the day was a football match between the football team of the branch and the Youth Soccer of their neighbour, the Archbishop Vinning Memorial Church.
It was no surprise that the church team won a resounding 3-0 victory over the Tigers. While the church team had an average age of 22 years for the players, the Tigers averaged no less than 37 years. They lacked both stamina and team co-ordination. Their fortunes went from bad to worse in the second half, with the exit of their captain, Adesina Ogunlana, due to thigh injury.
Even though the Tigers lost, they put up a stiff resistance and were cheered lustily by their supporters club led by Mrs. Gloria Nweze, the branch treasurer. At the end of the match, a lot of soft-drinks, meat-pies and scotch-eggs were provided for both teams and their supporters.
In the evening, the Tigers had a much happier outing at the Sheraton Hotel for their Dinner. Since inception of the branch, this would only be the second time the Tigers would be having their Law Week Dinner at the Sheraton.
The first time in 1992, it ended in fiasco as food ran out after the first fifty guests were served. But this year, even after more than the three hundred guests who came for the dinner served themselves ample and rich portions, there was food enough for at least no less than another hundred. Seeing the vast amount of scrumptious dishes still remaining, two members of the Law Week Committee, who had distinguished themselves a day before at the Lecture Hall as specialists in appropriating left-overs, tried to acquire the “remainder surplus” but were rebuffed by shocked and indignant Sheraton Hotel Staff, who shooed them away with icy remarks that: “This is a buffet, what your organization paid for is the satisfaction of three hundred guests, and nothing more”.
One of the leftovers-take over (LOTO) 'specialists' Mrs. Lynda Echeta, who heroically hauled off no less than thirty cans and bottles of soft drinks and some loads of food and meat, in open day-light without assistance after the Thursday lecture, was actually seen unfurling a poly-bag at the Sheraton, after Dinner, preparatory to loading some leftovers. The uncompromising Sheraton staff-officials however firmly killed her dream, leaving her grumpy and disappointed.
The very well attended dinner, chaired by a Justice of the Supreme Court, Justice George Oguntade, attracted the No 1 and 2 citizens of the State, in the persons of Mr. Babatunde Fashola S.A.N, Governor of the State and Mr. Ikuforiji, the Honourable Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, who was to later make a salient and poignant point that even though he, not being a lawyer is called 'unlearned,' yet he is the one who makes laws for the so called 'learned ones' (lawyers) to use.
The dinner started in earnest at 7.30 p.m. with the introductions to the high table handled by the duo of Deacon (Pastor) Dele Adesina S.A.N and Mrs. Tola Rotimi, Director, Office of the Public Defender (OPD) as comperes.
Four men, in the estimate of this magazine were the best dressed males at the dinner. Only three of them will be identified though. The first is Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu S.A.N, the president of the NBA who was quite a nice sight to behold with his natural Father Christmas moustache and grizzlies, coupled with his rich red bow-tie and pocket ’kerchief, certainly no Aba-made or Iwo road junction procurement.
The second is E.O. Ogundare Esq, a Chief Magistrate and a Deputy Chief Registrar, Lagos State High Court whose attempt to sit anonymously in the crowd of diners was frustrated by his handsome red waist coat which cut so perfectly matched the outlines of his jacket and shirt lapels and front to form a beguiling cupid’s heart.
The third is the master of ceremony himself Dele Adesina S.A.N. Just like Ogundare, the silk had a fetching red waist coat on. It was a quilted design that spoke glowingly of the glorious tapestry of Persian rugs and certainly made the ordinarily handsome Adesina, very attractive indeed.
As for the ladies, outstanding dressers were many but arguably the most spectacular was the wife of the Publicity Secretary of the branch, Mrs. Abdullateef Abdulsalam, whose all white ball-gown with matching blue and white turban and shoes made her truly impressive and regal.
The hottest babe of the evening however came in a smashing black, ‘back-less’ dress, leaving many men gaping and breathless. However seeing her in the risky company of a self-trained snooper who made a far and hidden corner of the hall his observatory perch, none came too near to express his interest.
Speaking at the occasion, the chairman of the dinner, Oguntade JSC observed that while it would be untrue to contend that since independence, Nigeria has not made progress, there is room for more progress.
His lordship urged lawyers to assist the courts in decongesting courts of cases, by practicing diligent and socially responsible advocacy. The chairman of the NBA Ikeja, Mr. Dave Ajetomobi, called upon to make his speech, used the opportunity to extol the virtues of Raji Fashola S.A.N as the Governor of the state and announced that a book of selected articles will soon be published by the branch in honour of the Governor.
After the Chairman’s speech, Mr. Wale Ogunade, a member of the Law Week Committee, read the citation of the Governor, who later received a plaque from Mr. Dave Ajetomobi. Another speaker at the dinner was the president of the NBA, who admonished and warned his colleagues that in the face of the distasteful social realities in the country that “the time might come, when we may have to throw away our suits and defend the constitutional liberties of our people.” In other words, lawyers should be prepared for revolution.
When called upon to make a speech, the Governor jokingly replied that he was only prepared to come and have an enjoyable dinner. But speak, His Excellency eventually did. For about twenty minutes. He spoke on the need to pay taxes, the need to sanction breachers of electoral laws, and his government's interest in making Reforms in the Land use legal regime.
The governor did not only employ facts and figures in his speech. He also showed traces of humour. For example, according to him for being located in the capital of Lagos State, the Ikeja Bar is not the Tiger Bar as she likes to call herself but the Capital Bar. The Governor made a passing remark about the honourable Commissioner for Justice and Attorney-General, Supo Sasore SAN in this humorous fashion - “I have an A.G who I will not trade for any other. Some people say they are the biggest but empty. But my A.G is the tallest in the Federation but full of content.”
The much awaited Dinner, came to pass after the Governor’s speech and all had more than enough to feast on. In the course of doing justice to the meals, the guests were entertained by a comedian (the same for Thursday). The comedian gave a fair account of himself but could have done better.
Thereafter Mr. Femi Falana gave the toast of Lagos State while Honourable Ikuforiji, gave the toast of the Bar.
It was time to draw the curtains on a memorable night.

BARRISTER JOE IGUNBOR AND THE CONVERTED N23,000.00

Called to the bar in August 1984, Jonathan Nofe Igunbor, was very much at home at the Ikeja bar for quite a long time, up till 2005. This is no surprise as Igunbor, popularly called Joe Igunbor had grown up in Lagos and speak unaccented Yoruba.
A general practitioner, Igunbor was well known in the Ikeja bar and had attempted in the past to become the chairman of the virile bar, popularly known as the Tiger Bar.
However since about five years ago, Igunbor an easy going fellow and a ready mixer-described by these who know him more closely as an otherwise-able lawyer, has become very scarce in the Tiger Bar.
Credible information has it that Igunbor has relocated finally to his true native roots-Benin. The move was said to be motivated by a desire to “make it more” in life as the gentleman, who is in his unripe fifties was said to believe he would thrive better in his native Benin, than Lagos, the land of his youth.
In fact there were some shreds of information that Igunbor is presently into farming in Benin apart from his legal practice.
However there indications that Igunbor’s relocation to Benin was more of a forced flight than a voluntary decision.
In the year 2005, in the administration of Adekunle Ojo Esq, as the Chairman of the Tiger Bar, Igunbor got himself engaged, himself in a scandal that touched on his financial integrity and scorched his reputation.
What happened was simple but unpalatable. Two members of the Tiger Bar had paid their Annual Conference fee, totaling about Twenty-three thousand naira, to the branch.
The branch was to forward members’ fees to the secretariat of the national body, at Victoria Island, Lagos.
On the very day the N23,000.00 was paid, Igunbor strolled into the branch secretariat. Just when one of the clerks of the Ikeja bar one Seun Fagunwa, who was instructed to take the money down to the National Secretariat, was ready to go on the errand Igunbor a well known “uncle” figure to the young woman asked her to give him the money as he too was going to the Victoria Island, just then and would help her to make the payment.
The clerk, happy to be relieved of the stress of a long journey, respectfully handed Igunbor the money. Unfortunately Igunbor failed, refused or and neglected to make the payment. Yet he equally, failed, refused or and neglected to return the money to the Ikeja Bar.
Igunbor’s misconduct was discovered when he had no receipts in proof of the payment, to give or show the NBA Ikeja.
Despite numerous demands on Igunbor all through 2005, and indeed up till date, he has not paid back the money. At least on no less than five occasions, since 2005, the Squib has had occasion to ask Joe Igunbor, when he would pay back the twenty-three thousand naira he fraudulently converted in 2005. Igunbor’s constant answer has always been “I will pay”.
It would be recalled that when the issue of Joe Igunbor’s conversion of the money in question was raised at a General meeting of the branch, some Senior counsel like Deacon Dele Adesina S.A.N frowned at the position of those who accused Igunbor of stealing the sum of twenty-three thousand naira, in the circumstances of the case, as stealing was guilty of the twenty-three thousand naira in question.
According to Adesina, since Igunbor was yet to be prosecuted and convicted for stealing the money, it was not right for the minutes of the meeting that discussed his case, to describe him as stealing the money.
It is disheartening and disturbing to note that the incidence of financial misdeeds such as conversion of client’s funds and properties, theft, forgery etc are on a sharp rise amongst Nigerian lawyers, a situation, if condoned or complacently treated will soon rise to epidemic proportions.
The question remain: Where is Barrister Joe Igunbor? When is he going to pay back the #23,000.00 he stole from the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja branch?

CHIEF AJIBOLA ARIBISALA: AN "IROKO TREE LIZARD" SILK?

Is it a crime for a man to blow his own trumpet even stridently? Certainly no. But immodest, self-praise bordering on exaggeration is rather odd, if not offensive in genteel society and in conservative professions like law.

The Squib in one of her many peregrinations stumbled on the curriculum vitae of Chief Ajibola Aribisala SAN which document was backing the silk's recent application to become a Notary Public.

To say the least, the C.V has very interesting portions, which in our editorial view, should not serve as a template for emulation by other lawyers, especially impressionable younger ones at the bar who may mistake vice for virtue,simply because it comes from a distinguished senior practitioner.

Save for the address, telephone numbers, fax and e-mail address, the said C.V of Chief Aribisala SAN is wholly herein reproduced as it is and so all perceived deficiencies therein, are left as it were, unedited. So it is not a matter of the printer's devil being at work here.

Is it a crime for a man to blow his own trumpet even stridently?

ADENIYI AJIFERUKE: THE LAWYER WHO STOLE A JACKET!

The Secretariat of the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja branch, popularly known as the Bar Centre is a favourite 'haunt' of many practicing lawyers.
Lawyers and even non-lawyers, come to Bar Centre to make sundry enquiries, purchase law texts and matter, alas, read and study, hold meetings, use the conveniences, lodge complaints etc.

Thus it is normal for the Centre to have people therein, especially the front desk portion which also serves as the books shop.
Occasionally, complaints and lamentations are heard from Queen Ebohon the bar clerk, that certain of her books, and sometimes cash were spirited away by unknown person. On such occasions, people wondered whether the pilferers could include legal practitioners.

On February 19 2009, a very clear but sad answer was received in response to the question “oh yes, lawyers number among those who have been pilfering at the Bar Centre.”

The day before, at about 12:30p.m, Mr. Adesina Adegbite, the Assistant General Secretary of the Ikeja branch, came to the Bar Centre to check on other leaders of the branch, all preparing to travel later in afternoon to Osogbo, Osun State for the NBA's National Executive Council (NEC) Meeting which would take place between 19th -20th February 2009.
Adegbite, glad to meet his colleagues carefully draped his black, well-tailored jacket on the back of a chair in the library of the Bar Centre, exchanged a few banters with some of the people around, before moving out to sort out some things in some other places in the court premises.
Like the other Tigers, he was not prepared to go to Osogbo dressed up. He wanted to travel light and casual. To the gentleman's surprise, then astonishment and finally bewilderment, when he came back to the Bar Centre, about an hour later he could not find his jacket again. Just could not find it.

It took the officer of the bar a while for him to come to terms that a filcher had 'stung' him. He was almost going about in circles in the small library, in vain apparently, searching for his jacket, which plus the matching trousers had cost him not so chicken a change of N45,000:00
Some of his colleagues present, including Adesina Ogunlana Esq, the First Gecko himself and the welfare officer of the branch, at this point noticed Adegbite's discomfiture, for though calm, the man obviously was in a puzzled shock. Adegbite quickly told them of the embarrassing situation he just found himself-the disappearance of his prized jacket, right in the library under the noses of the leaders of the branch.

The magical disappearance of Adegbite's jacket stunned everybody, as nobody knew who took the jacket away or in the alternative, how the jacket took a stroll away, unnoticed from where it was kept.
The mystery did not last for long however. After about an hour, the First Gecko who had been around at the Bar Centre at all material times, before and after the disappearance of Adegbite's jacket put on his Squib's special thinking cap.
Then he called his other colleagues and told them of his suspicion. Said the F.G.

“Gentlemen, I suspect the thief could well be so and so person because he is the only new face who I saw today in the Bar Centre here around the front desk. Also you know the jacket was kept in the library and so was removed from the library. Since only lawyers are allowed in the library, then a non-lawyer would not have access to the library talk-less of taking away the jacket from there.

Even more crucially, I noticed that when so and so person was leaving the Bar Centre this afternoon, I noticed that the jacket he was wearing was well tailored and of good quality and could not help but wonder where a young lawyer still searching for employment, could afford such a good jacket.”

The F.G's reasoning appealed to his colleagues, who considered it plausible and attractive. There and then, one of them a young lady counsel (names withheld) who happened to know the Mr. so and so, was actually one Bashir Adeniyi Ajiferuke, put a call to Ajiferuke a former school mate at the university, with a determined intention to lure the gentleman-thief back to the Bar Centre. Knowing that Ajiferuke was a job seeker, the lady used that as a bait, asking Ajiferuke to come back quickly to the Bar Centre for a sudden job opening. But tried as much as she did, Ajiferuke refused to come back saying he was already too far away in town from the Bar Centre, to return.

At this point, suspicion heightened among the Tiger leaders that indeed Ajiferuke, with his dogged refusal to come back to the Bar Centre could well be the thief, but it remained only that-mere suspicion.
The concrete proof of Ajiferuke's culpability came less than twenty hours later. Early the next morning at about 6.30a.m, Ajiferuke sneaked back to the Bar Centre. He went to the back of the library carefully opened the window louvers through the security latches and pushed the coat through down into the floor of the library.

Unfortunately for the thief, somebody saw him at his escapade. The person, another young lady (names withheld) who works in one of the shops in the court premises was surprised to see Ajiferuke opening the windows of the Bar Centre so early in the morning and pushing a jacket down into it. She went over to challenge Ajiferuke who quickly claimed that he was a lawyer and the jacket he was pushing into the library belonged to him. “I just want to keep the jacket in the library for now. I will come back later to take it.”

The lie worked and Ajiferuke's challenger went away. If Ajiferuke had left things at that, maybe his cover might not have been blown. Unfortunately like most smart Alecs, he over-played his hands. Ajiferuke came back later, in the day to confront the Bar Clerk, Miss Queen Ebohon over certain news he heard that a jacket was missing from the Bar Centre library, the previous day and that his name was mentioned as being responsible. He asked Queen to open the library, assuring her that “you will find that the jacket was not missing after all.”

Very reluctantly, Queen who had participated in the futile search for the jacket the previous day in the library, obliged Ajiferuke.
To her surprise, the coat indeed was found in the library. But no fool, Queen knew something was fishy and insisted that the coat was not in the library when it was searched for the day before.

In the ensuing argument between Ajiferuke and Queen, the lady who had accosted him in the morning, came to the Bar Centre, but thought the duo was arguing on something else.

Sometime later, after Ajiferuke had taken his leave, Queen now related to the young lady the cause of the quarrel between her and Ajiferuke. To Queen's utter surprise, her interlocutor replied with a narration of her own encounter with Ajiferuke much earlier in the morning, at the back of the library.

Since February 19 2009, nobody has seen Ajiferuke near even one hundred metre radius of the Bar Centre. But what made Ajiferuke come back in the morning of 19/2/2009 after successfully stealing away Adegbite's jacket?
Ajiferuke's action came out of fear. He had received in the evening of Wednesday 18/2/2009, a call from his former School mate who had called him earlier in the afternoon to come down for a job opening at the Bar Centre.

This time, Ajiferuke’s caller, putting off her gloves, straightaway asked Ajiferuke to go back to the Bar Centre and return Adegbite's jacket since “everybody especially the leaders have now known that you were the one who took it.”

Rattled by the information which was actually a bluff, Ajiferuke felt he had no better option other than to obey his caller's advice, but without exposing him as the jacket thief- hence the strategy of the back-door drop of the jacket.

Ajiferuke, who joined the NBA Ikeja branch as a member late 2008, according to his curriculum vitae, was born in 1978 and graduated from the Lagos State University LASU in 2002 but was called to the bar 2008.