After
the dissolution of the Omole led executive, the next stage was the swearing-in
into office of the successor administration led by Monday Onyekachi Ubani as Chairman.
The other officers are Adesina Ogunlana – 1st Vice Chairman, Carolyn
Ibeh – 2nd Vice-Chairman, Adesina Adegbite – General Secretary,
Carolyn Ibharuneafe – Treasurer (returned unopposed) Segun Fatoki – Financial
Secretary (returned unopposed) Samson Omodara – Welfare Secretary (returned
unopposed) Meimuna Esegime – Publicity Secretary, Titi Osagie – Social
Secretary, Nelly Silver Ajalaye – Auditor.
This
seemingly simple task- suddenly became sticky, difficult and clamorous. The
problem was deciding who would conduct the swearing in ceremony for the
officers – the Electoral Committee or the Branch Chairman.
When
the out-going or rather out-gone Chairman declared that he was ready to do the swearing
in ceremony, there was an uproar in the meeting place as supporters of both the
in-coming chairman, Monday Ubani and the Electoral Committee which had become
exposed as involved in the partisan struggle for power in the Ikeja Bar began
loud, even tumultuous agitation for the Electoral Committee to conduct the inauguration.
The
tumult did not move Adebamigbe Omole, one inch. He proved on this occasion
perhaps more than at any other time in his chairmanship that he indeed is an
Omole (TOUGH CHILD).
He
insisted that the Electoral Committee, having refused to participate in the
amicable settlement of suit no: ID/345M/2012
Yinka Farounbi v Dosu Ogunniyi and 8 ORS brought by Yinka Farounbi the 1st
runner-up in the chairmanship election against the Electoral Committee and all
the winners of the Election and that the Committee not being a signatory to the
terms of settlement before the court (see cover story exhibit) as well as being
under the restraint of court by way of a still subsisting injunction, can not
swear in all those elected in the 9th May 2012 elections conducted
by her pending the determination of the Motion on Notice (which is yet to be moved).
According to an unyielding Omole the Electoral Committee cannot take advantage
of Section 19 of the Bye Law and standing Orders of the Branch which provides
thus “The chairman or any member of the
Electoral member of the Electoral Committee or the out-going Branch Chairman
shall swear-in all newly elected officers by administering the Oath of office
contained in the first schedule to this Bye-Law immediately after the
dissolution of the Branch Executive Council at the conclusion of the Annual
General meeting”.
While
the Ubani Group were shouting and clamouring for the EC to conduct the inauguration, the committee members were in disarray.
While the Secretary of the Committee Mrs. Funmi Falana the de-facto ruler of the EC
sat perched near Femi Falana her husband and counsel in court on the second
row, Mr. Dosu Ogunniyi the de-jure
leader of the Committee maintained a lonely, needle-in-the-haystack existence
at the back of the hall while Mr. Reginald Ugwuadu the 3rd member and
the Houdini act of the EC was simply lost in the crowd.
All
entreaties to Omole from elders of the Branch like Olalekan Yusuf and Dele
Adesina S.A.N to persuade Omole to allow the Electoral Committee to conduct the
Swearing-in ceremony or at least have the honour of calling out the in-coming
Executive Committee members, for the Swearing-in to be conducted by Omole
himself, fell on deaf ears.
“I will not allow it. I will not allow it.
We have to follow the Bye-Law or there is no swearing-in. The Electoral
Committee will not do the Swearing in. Any one who is interested in being sworn
had better come out now” insisted Omole emphatically while waving the Bye
Law in the air.
In
the face of an un-budging chairman, the ball was played squarely into the Ubani
camp: either follow the Electoral Committee
and not get sworn-in or ditch the Electoral Committee and get sworn
in.
After
a while, the tension lessened and the clamour went down. Constitutionalism,
though standing virtually alone, but upheld by a steely, unwavering resolve had
prevailed.
The winners of
the 9th May 2012 election (expecting Meimuna Esegine who was absent
at the AGM) as well the officers returned unopposed stepped out and were
inaugurated by Adebamigbe Omole Esq in
line with the Bye-Law and Standing Order.
Thus the Monday Onyekachi
Ubani led administration started its life. The new leader of the Branch, Ubani
gave an acceptance speech for himself and on behalf of his co-leaders. It was a
short and reconciliatory speech, in the expected “no victor, no vanquished”
mode but he did not forget to thank the umpire of the hugely controversial
election for “a job well done”.
Though on the
surface all seems well now with the Ikeja Bar, with the existence of a new
administration, keen observers however are adopting a wait and see attitude to
know whether the rendering crisis engendered by the circumstances of the 9th
May 2012 elections have been truly and finally settled.
The
first fact of interest to observers is the continuous existence of suit no
ID/345M/2012. As had earlier noted not all the parties to the suit participates
in the Terms of Settlement.
The
bone of contention still remains:- whether or not the Electoral Committee 1st
Defendant in the suit acted in accordance with the provisions of the Branch Law
to prevent otherwise qualified voters from voting in the said election for
failure to pay practising fees for the year 2012 or failure to pay same on or
before 31st March 2012?
The
Farounbi suit a.k.a the Practising Fee
case is now before Honourable Justice Idowu of the Ikeja High Court who is
the third judge in less than two months to handle the matter.
The
first trial judge, Honourable Justice Toyin Taiwo presided over the matter
twice. At her first sitting the judge granted Farounbi’s prayer for interim
injunction restraining the winners of the election from parading themselves as
such while also restraining the Electoral Committee and the 2nd
defendant (the out-going chairman as at then) from swearing in the winners of
the election until the determination of the motion on notice for interlocutory
injunction.
Till
date, the motion on notice is yet to be taken while the order of injunction is
yet to be discharged. For no officially stated reason, Honourable Justice Taiwo
withdrew from the matter, which was transferred to Justice Opeyemi Oke for
determination. Geckos however inform the Squib reliable that the Honourable
Judge withdrew from the case to stop the insinuation that she was taken side
with the claimant in the matter whom the Ubani group claimed had the support of
Mr. Taiwo Taiwo the chairman of NBA Lagos and Husband of the trial judge.
Oke
J. was about to hear and determine the plethora of preliminary objections in
the matter from the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 8th
defendants, when the 3rd defendants fired a petition via the
chambers of Messers Okey Ogbu and Co
to Philip J. the new Honourable Chief Judge of Lagos State, accusing the
learned trial judge of bias and working to the end of ensuring that the 3rd
defendant was not sworn in into office on the 4th of June 2012.
The
petition however failed as the Chief Judge saw no merit in it but Justice Oke
who felt grossly insulted by the murky content of the petition, returned the
file back to the Chief Judge for assignment to another judge. Thus on the 27th
June 2012 when the matter was to come up before Justice Oke and the parties and
counsel reported to the court, they were confronted with a shocker.
The
judge announced his lordship’s withdrawal from the case “to let all of you know why I have withdrawn from the matter since I am
not sure the petitioner (the 3rd Defendant) made available to other
parties copies of his petition against me to the Chief Judge” Further said
the judge – “I do not expect any lawyer
to be a liar and to suppress material facts. A person who complies a record of
proceedings in this matter and yet did not include the order of Justice Taiwo
which states that her order of interim injunction remains effective until the
determination of interlocutory injunction in his petition to the Chief Judge
can only be up to mischief.
It’s only a desperate person who can
do such and a desperate person can do anything. However Lagos has the most
populous number of legal practitioners and in that huge number there will be
the type of the third defendant.
I have handed him over to my own
advocate, the almighty God, to judge. I am withdrawing from this case so that
the 3rd defendant, should he lose in this case, will not be able to
claim that he lost because the judge was already biased against him.”
Thus
it was only before Honourable Justice Yetunde Idowu, whom the Chief Judge
transferred the matter to from Justice Oke that the Terms of Settlement between
the claimant and the 2nd – 9th defendants was entered.
The
Squib reports that even getting the terms signed by the claimant (Yinka
Farounbi) and the 3rd defendant (Monday Ubani) was problematic.
Initially meant to be an all inclusive settlement, the 3rd defendant
in the morning of 27th June 2012 stated that he would execute the
document, if only the 1st defendant (Electoral Committee) signed.
Incidentally, the 1st Defendant (Dosu Ogunniyi) was not prepared to
sign the document as it was. As for the claimant, he was simply no where to be
seen in the morning of 27th June 2012. Not only that he was in communicado
even to leading members of his political group, the Progressives. Even long
after the terms were amended to exclude the Electoral Committee as party to the
Terms of Settlement, Farounbi was still out of reach. While the leaders of the
Progressive group were simply embarrassed at Farounbi’s absence, the Ubani
group firmly believed that the progressives were hatching another plot against
their interest.
Eventually
at about 2.00pm the claimant “surfaced”
and the Terms were eventually signed by the claimant and the 3rd
Defendant after some drama about who would sign first.
The
pendency of the practising fee case is a real threat to the Ubani
administration, for in the view of some legal experts, the claimant’s case
challenging the validity of the May 9 2012 election is a strong and credible
one, with the strong possibility of a legal triumph in the court of law.
The
second consideration for “worry” about the future of the Ubani administration
is the nature of its composition, split as it were unevenly into two parts. The
first part comprises of the Chairman
himself, the Publicity Secretary and
the Social Secretary, all who are
either in the same camp or are strong allies.
The
second group comprises the 1st
Vice-Chairman, the 2nd
Vice Chairman, the General Secretary,
the Treasurer, the Financial Secretary, the Welfare Secretary and the Auditor, all who are of the Progressive
Group.
Quite
an interesting political situation, this is. According to observers because the
apex control of the Ikeja Bar belongs to a member of the minority group which
has only three portfolios, to its counter-part’s seven and which group controls
the very crucial portfolios of the Secretariat and the entirety of the
Financial Department.
This
clearly rather delicate situation which would test the political and
administrative sagacity of the new regime is made much more acute by the
quality of the personalities of the two most senior members of the team-Chairman
Monday Ubani and 1st Vice Chairman Adesina Ogunlana.
Whether
by mere sheer coincidence or a certain mystical arrangement, both leaders are
born in the same date, day, month and year (Monday 27 July 1964) and as such
according to the ‘science’ of astrology are Leos. The 1st Vice Chairman had claimed rather dubiously
however, that while he was born 12.00am in the morning, the Chairman was born
late in the evening at about 10.00pm.
Both
share some similar character traits of being hardy, colourful, expressive,
tempestuous, daring, assertive, gregarious, organized and engaging.
It
would be seen in a few weeks how the combination will work out. If the duo
jells, the Ikeja Bar surely would be in for dizzying times of achievement, but
if they fall out, all the troubles of the past few weeks could be a child’s
play.
Time,
will surely tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment